Who Upholds the Rule of Law
The rule of law is particularly important as an influence on the economic development of developing countries and countries with economies in transition. So far, the term “rule of law” is mainly used in English-speaking countries and has not yet been fully clarified, even with regard to established democracies such as Sweden, Denmark, France, Germany or Japan. A common language between lawyers in common law and civil law countries, as well as between the legal communities in developed and developing countries, is essential to explore the links between the rule of law and the real economy.  John Locke, in the second of his Two Treatises of Government (1689), emphasized the importance of governance through “permanent laws established, promulgated, and known to the people.” He opposed this to domination by “temporary arbitrary decrees” (Locke 1689: §§ 135-7). Now, the term “arbitrary” can mean many different things. Sometimes it means “oppressive.” But when Locke distinguished the rule of established laws from arbitrary decrees, it was not the oppressive feeling of “arbitrariness” that he had in mind. In this context, something is arbitrary because it is temporary: there is no notice of that; The sovereign simply discovers it while he is participating. It is the arbitrariness of the unpredictability of not knowing what one can count on, of being submissive, as Locke said (1689: § 137), of being subject to someone. The Oxford English Dictionary has defined the rule of law as follows: The natural freedom of man is to be free from any higher power on earth and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man. but to have only the natural law for his reign.
Human liberty in society may not be the subject of any legislative power other than that established by consent in the community; nor under the domination of any will or limitation of any law, but that which this legislature must promulgate according to the confidence placed in it. Freedom is therefore not what Sir Robert Filmer tells us, Observations, A. 55. the freedom for each to do as he enumerates, to live as he pleases, and not to be bound by laws: but the liberty of men under government means to have a permanent rule by which one may live, which is common to all in this society, and which is made by the legislative power established in it; the freedom to follow my own will in all things where the rule does not prescribe it; and not to be subject to the impermanent, uncertain, unknown, arbitrary volatile will of another man: as is the freedom of nature to be subject to no limitation other than the law of nature.  Various organisations are committed to promoting the rule of law. In the United States, there are countless ways of defining the rule of law and may depend on an organization`s purpose, including in areas of security risk: [T]he extent to which the corporation is bound by law has engaged in processes that secure property rights under legal rules that are applied in a predictable manner and are not subject to the whims of special individuals, Questions. Commitment to such processes is the essence of the rule of law. Cass (2004: 131) The year is 1967. In the city-state of Singapore, which had become independent only two years earlier, the rule of law was “reasonably established”1.
“No one doubts that someone will be executed at the whim of another,” the prime minister said with quiet satisfaction. Strengthening the rule of law implies respect for the norms of international law, including the use of force, and recognition of the primary responsibility of States to protect their populations from genocide, crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing and war crimes. The rule of law is a central element of the humanitarian and human rights agenda; is essential for understanding and addressing the causes of displacement and statelessness; and forms the basis of the humanitarian protection regime. The use of the term dates back to the 16th century in Britain. In the following century, the Scottish theologian Samuel Rutherford opposed the divine right of kings.  John Locke wrote that liberty in society means being subject only to laws enacted by a legislature that apply to all, with a person otherwise free from governmental and private restrictions on liberty. “The rule of law” was popularized in the 19th century by the British jurist A. V. Hasardeux.
However, the principle, if not the phrase itself, was recognized by ancient thinkers. Aristotle wrote: “It is more appropriate for the law to govern than any other citizen.”  This emphasis on the value of complexity—how complicated laws, particularly property laws, provide protections under which people can find shelter from the intrusive demands of power—has continued to fascinate modern rule of law theorists (e.g., Thompson 1975: 258-69). No one doubts that legislation can sometimes undermine the rule of law, for example by purporting to remove legal responsibility for a number of official acts or to exclude the possibility of judicial review of executive actions. But this is not a problem with the legislation as such; This is a concern about the content of some regulations. Moreover, rule by judges can sometimes be seen as precisely the type of male rule that the rule of law is intended to replace (see Waldron 2002: 142-3 and 147-8). A similar question arises with regard to the use of standards, which are more of a standard than a rule. (A rule is like a digital speed limit, while a standard is like a standard that requires people to drive at a “reasonable” speed.) Legal systems use both types of norms (Sunstein, 1994); They use standards for cases where the appropriate decision may vary depending on environmental conditions, and it seems preferable to trust the judgment of those in a particular situation rather than set it in advance. There is an element of respect for the individual`s ability to judge that is conveyed by the use of a standard. At the same time, standards allow for less legal certainty, especially when it is difficult for the person trying to comply with the standard to predict how his or her judgment will be judged by an official or court. Hayek suggests that the company subject human behavior to rules. A confession to the opinion that man.
A responsible actor able to understand and follow the rules. Any deviation from the principles of the internal morality of law is an affront to human dignity as a responsible actor. To judge his actions according to unpublished or retroactive laws, or to order him to act which is impossible, means, . Their indifference to its power of self-determination. (Fuller 1964:162) Magna Carta: Foundations of the Rule of Law Worksheet The principle was also discussed by Montesquieu in L`esprit des lois (1748).  The term “rule of law” appears in Samuel Johnson`s Dictionary (1755).  Generality is an important feature of legality, which is reflected in the long-standing constitutional antipathy to Attainder`s bills. Of course, the law cannot function without special ordinances, but as Raz (1979 :213) points out, the general public requirement is generally understood to mean that “the creation of certain laws should be guided by open and relatively stable general rules.” These rules themselves should be impersonal and impartial.
Kevin Lindgren, a former judge of the Federal Court of Australia, was appointed Associate Professor of Rule of Law at the University of Sydney in 2012. He has lectured extensively on the concept of the rule of law and is the author of an article entitled “The Rule of Law: Its State of Health in Australia”. The Institute has also produced a short series of lectures on our YouTube channel to capture key aspects of Professor Lindgren`s lectures, such as: Some lawyers who maintain the opposition between the rule of law and the rule of law have a more ambitious agenda. They take seriously the age-old idea that we can be governed by laws and not by people. One wonders: how is this going to be done? After all, all laws are made by people and interpreted by people and enforced by people. He can no longer govern us alone, without human help, than a cannon can dominate us, without a hardware store to launch it, and a gunner to charge and fire it.